Curlee Sherman v. Paul Miller

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1538
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL MILLER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-1098-5)
Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment
adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint
pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman
v. Miller, No. CA-04-1098-5 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --