Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1474•Vicki S. Pless v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
04-1474Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.10.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1474
VICKI S. PLESS; COY E. PLESS,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 03-1917)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki S. Pless, Coy E. Pless, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Bricken,
Carol Ann Barthel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vicki S. Pless and Coy E. Pless appeal from the tax
court’s orders upholding the notice of federal tax lien with
respect to the Plesses’ 1998 income tax liability and upholding the
Commissioner’s determination that Vicki Pless was not entitled to
relief from joint and several liability. We have reviewed the
record and the tax court’s memorandum and opinions and find no
abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Pless v.
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 03-1917 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 3, 10 &
19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.