Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1385•Gertrude E. Jordan v. General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
04-1385Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.08.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1385
GERTRUDE E. JORDAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-
638-RWT)
Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gertrude E. Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. H. Dean Bouland, Jr., Leslie
John Williams, Jr., BOULAND & BRUSH, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland,
Lisa K. Burrow, GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS,
Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gertrude E. Jordan appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. See Jordan v. General Conference of Seventh-Day
Adventists, No. CA-03-638-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 25, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.