Imad Issa v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General

04-1380Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.01.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1380
IMAD ISSA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A23-105-916)
Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard W. Moore, Jr., LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD W. MOORE, PA, Towson,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Daniel E.
Goldman, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Imad Issa, a native and citizen of Lebanon, seeks review
of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming
without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and conclude that we
are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See 8 U.S.C.
§§ 1252(a)(2)(C), 1227(a)(2)(B) (2000). We accordingly dismiss
the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.