Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1331•Tesfaye Teferi v. John Ashcroft
04-1331Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.11.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1331
TESFAYE TEFERI,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A76-898-259)
Submitted: October 20, 2004 Decided: November 4, 2004
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J.
Scadron, Assistant Director, Genevieve Holm, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION
LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Tesfaye Teferi, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board). The order denied his motion to reconsider the
Board’s denial of his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the
record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying Teferi’s motion to reconsider. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Teferi, No.
A76-898-259 (BIA Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.