Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1275•Charles William Levy v. County of Fairfax, Virginia
04-1275Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.05.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1275
CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; DEPARTMENT OF
FAMILY SERVICES; LERNER CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-04-96-A)
Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles William Levy appeals from the district court’s
orders dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction and
denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record
and the district court’s opinions disclose no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Levy’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis
and for an injunction and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Levy v. County of Fairfax, No.
CA-04-96-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2004 & Feb. 6, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.