Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1226•Shunda T. Francis v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
04-1226Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.08.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1226
SHUNDA T. FRANCIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-03-968-3)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shunda T. Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Shunda T. Francis appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Francis v.
Virginia, No. CA-03-968-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.