Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1119•Garri Shtein v. Bank of America, Fsb
04-1119Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.06.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1119
GARRI SHTEIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BANK OF AMERICA, FSB,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-03-1159-CBD)
Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 1, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Patrick McGlone, Todd
Russell Chason, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Garri Shtein appeals the magistrate judge’s letter order
dismissing his discrimination and conspiracy to invade privacy
action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the magistrate judge. See Shtein v. Bank of America, No.
CA-03-1159-CBD (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.