Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1079•Edward P. Craig, Jr v. Internal Revenue Service
04-1079Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.04.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1079
EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; MARK W. EVERSON,
Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-03-908-A)
Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward P. Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Karen
Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C.; Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward P. Craig, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a refund of
income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Craig v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. CA-03-908-A
(E.D. Va. filed Dec. 23, 2003; entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.