Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-7968•James B. Weersing v. S. Captain, Shift Supervisor
03-7968Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.07.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7968
JAMES B. WEERSING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. CAPTAIN, SHIFT SUPERVISOR; C. MITCHELL,
Grievance Officer; CALVIN ANTHONY, Warden;
GARY MAYNARD, Director, South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-01-308-8-24BI)
Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Weersing, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS
& MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James B. Weersing appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Weersing v. Sanyo, No.
CA-01-308-8-24BI (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.