Mark E. Richards v. LARRY W. SAUNDERS, Warden

03-7774Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.01.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7774
MARK E. RICHARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY W. SAUNDERS, Warden; ANTHONY PARKER;
KIMBERLY ORDILE, Operations Officer; JANE
MENEFEE, Mailroom Officer; FOUR UNKNOWN POLICE
OFFICERS, Coffeewood Correctional Center; FOUR
UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, The Virginia
Department of Corrections; RONALD J. ANGELONE,
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections;
BARRY MEADOR, Coffeewood Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-805-7)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his
civil rights complaint challenging the conditions of confinement.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Richards v. Saunders, No. CA-01-805-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 2,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.