Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-7732•Clifton Patterson v. LARRY W. POWERS, Warden
03-7732Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.02.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7732
CLIFTON PATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY W. POWERS, Warden; SPELLER; NFN CARTER;
LIEUTENANT PILGRIM; THOMAS MILLER; DOCTOR
BIANCO; NFN GREENE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-02-4145-6-22AK)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifton Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, HOLCOMBE,
BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina; Edward
Grainger Smith, BUTLER, MEANS, EVINS & BROWNE, Spartanburg, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clifton Patterson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Patterson v.
Powers, No. CA-02-4145-6-22AK (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.