Sterling Boone v. RANDY LEE, Superintendent

03-7710Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.02.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7710
STERLING BOONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDY LEE, Superintendent; WILLIAM MAYO,
Sargeant; JEFF BATTLE; LENWOOD KNIGHT; RICKY
ANDERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (CA-03-722-5-FL)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sterling Boone, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sterling Boone appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Boone’s motion to
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Lee, No. CA-03-722-
5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.