Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-7569•Samuel Wright v. TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden
03-7569Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.02.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7569
SAMUEL WRIGHT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-1401-5)
Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Wright, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition challenging the legality of his conviction and sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Williamson,
No. CA-02-1401-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.