Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-7284•David L. Carter v. Evans, No. CA-02-492-5-HC-BO E.D.N.C. July 22, 2002 & filed Aug. 1, 2003
03-7284Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.02.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7284
DAVID L. CARTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ORINDA EVANS; WILLIAM HARPER; KATHLEEN SWAYER;
ARTHUR BEELER; THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-492-5-HC-BO)
Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David L. Carter appeals district court orders denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and denying his motion
for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record
and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Carter v. Evans, No. CA-02-492-5-HC-BO
(E.D.N.C. July 22, 2002 & filed Aug. 1, 2003; entered Aug. 5,
2003). We grant Carter’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.