United States of America v. Dalma S. Edwards, a/k/a Mike Edwards

03-7250Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.01.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7250
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DALMA S. EDWARDS, a/k/a Mike Edwards,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-01-70)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dalma S. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Krask, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dalma S. Edwards appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for return of seized property. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Edwards, No. CR-01-70 (E.D. Va. filed July 28, 2003 & entered
July 29, 2003). We also deny Edwards’ motion for transcripts at
government expense and for production of documents. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.