Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-6682•Matthew Otis Charles v. TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden
03-6682Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.09.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6682
MATTHEW OTIS CHARLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District
Judge. (CA-03-104-5)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Otis Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Otis Charles, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his petition styled as an application under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. See Charles v. Williamson, No. CA-03-104-5 (S.D.W.
Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.