Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-6504•Lacy Hughes Johnson v. SARGEANT SHREVE, Correctional Officer
03-6504Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.05.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6504
LACY HUGHES JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SARGEANT SHREVE, Correctional Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-03-202-2)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lacy Hughes Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lacy Hughes Johnson appeals the district court’s order and
judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (2000) his civil
rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Johnson v. Shreve, No. CA-03-202-2 (E.D.
Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.