United States of America v. Augustine Perez

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6364
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
AUGUSTINE PEREZ,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
$15,716.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-90-4-L)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CA-90-4-L
(W.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --