Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-6311•Dwayne Moore v. Department of Corrections
03-6311Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.05.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6311
DWAYNE MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; D. STILL, Sergeant;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHULER, Security;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILLY, Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-03-68-7)
Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, his motion to reconsider
that order, and the denial of his motion for summary judgment which
was filed after the case was closed. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Dep’t of Corr.,
No. CA-03-68-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.