Rodney M. Lunsford v. Scott Wade Powell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6310
RODNEY M. LUNSFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCOTT WADE POWELL; SERGEANT SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-490-5-BO)
Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney M. Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Mary S. Mercer, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney M. Lunsford appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Lunsford v. Powell,
No. CA-02-490-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --