Andre Edmonds v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 4th Cir. 1993 . 2 Unpublished opinions are not…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6224
ANDRE EDMONDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELIZABETH H. PARET,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHN J. MOORE; VALERIE CARR; VICTORIA PAULEY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-805)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Tara Louise Casey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

* Edmonds’ claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that
Paret perpetrated a fraud on the district court in her defense of
this matter is not properly before this court for consideration.
Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Andre Edmonds appeals the district court’s order dismissing
all claims against Elizabeth H. Paret, Clerk for the United States
District Court, Eastern District of Virginia.* We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Moore, No. CA-
02-805 (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --