Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-6220•United States of America v. Rodney Eugene Smith
03-6220Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.04.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RODNEY EUGENE SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Charles H. Haden II,
District Judge. (CR-01-7)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Eugene Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Karen B. George, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s order denying
his “Verified Emergency Petition to Arrest Judgment for Lack of
Subject Matter Jurisdiction.” We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-01-7 (S.D.W.
Va. Jan. 13, 2003). We deny Smith’s motion for default judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.