Julius Lawrence-Bey v. Harrell Watts

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6200
JULIUS LAWRENCE-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; MARGARET C.
HAMBRICK; J.E. GUNJA; GARY I. REYNOLDS; ROBERT
CENDO; THAO NGUYEN; JOSEPH BROOKS; B. KATTA;
A. ZAYAS; J. FAJARDO; C. MENDOZA; Y. APONTE-
RENFRO; A. BLANKENSHIP; PRAKASH KARANVIR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-02-1753-AM)
Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julius Lawrence-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Julius Lawrence-Bey appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Lawrence-Bey v. Watts, No. CA-02-1753-AM (E.D.
Va. filed Jan. 6, 2003, and entered Jan. 7, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --