Edward P. Craig, Jr v. PAMELA J. GARDNER, Acting Treasury Inspector General for Tax Affairs (TIGTA)

03-2507Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.03.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2507
EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAMELA J. GARDNER, Acting Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Affairs (TIGTA),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-912-A)
Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: March 30, 2004
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward P. Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Karen Deborah Utiger,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward P. Craig, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of mandamus in which he sought
an order from the district court directing the Acting Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Affairs to investigate his allegations of
wrongdoing by the Atlanta Service Center. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Craig v. Gardner,
No. CA-03-912-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 14, 2003; entered Nov. 17,
2003). We deny Craig’s motion opposing a change of venue and his
motion to take a deposition. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.