Christopher Langdon v. T. L. Malone

03-2493Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.06.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2493
CHRISTOPHER LANGDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
T. L. MALONE; JERRY BREWER; ED GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-189-5-BO)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 2, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Langdon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Orr Crawford, III,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Lisa Carol Glover, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s
order denying his post-judgment motions to compel discovery and to
recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Langdon v. Malone, No. CA-02-189-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 21, 2003). We deny Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We deny
Langdon’s motion to consolidate, motion to extend time to file a
response to Appellees’ motion for sanctions, and motion to strike
Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We also deny Langdon’s motion for
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.