Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-2487•Charles Alston v. Virginia Judiciary System
03-2487Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.02.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2487
CHARLES ALSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA JUDICIARY SYSTEM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-03-410-A)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Alston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alston appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Alston v. Virginia Judiciary
Sys., No. CA-03-410-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 16, 2003 & entered
Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.