Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-2482•Michael D. Wilkins v. KEITH PHILLIPS, Trustee
03-2482Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.06.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2482
MICHAEL D. WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KEITH PHILLIPS, Trustee,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-03-493-3; BK-99-34315)
Submitted: May 10, 2004 Decided: June 25, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. David Richard Ruby,
MCSWEENEY & CRUMP, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Wilkins appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying Wilkins’ motion to
reconsider a prior order denying his request for an accounting from
the bankruptcy trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Wilkins v. Phillips, Nos. CA-03-493-3; BK-
99-34315 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2003). We deny Wilkins’ motion for a
change of venue and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.