Darryl Allmond v. Section 8 Department of Housing

03-2307Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2307
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SECTION 8 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING; JOHN TYLER;
JOHN TURNER; BRUCE HANNEMAN; BRIAN O’MALIE;
SANDHU; JIM HALL; MICHAEL FINKLE; PAULA
SAMPSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-894)
Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 9, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Tianti, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Allmond v. Section 8 Dep’t of
Housing, No. CA-03-894 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 25, 2003 & entered
Sept. 30, 2003; Oct. 8, 2003). We also find that the district
court properly denied Allmond’s motion for substitution and decided
the case without oral argument. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.