Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-2295•Charles William Levy v. COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Virginia
03-2295Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.02.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2295
CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Virginia; FAIRFAX COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-953-A)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Everett Rose, III,
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles William Levy appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. Our review of
the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Levy v. County of Fairfax, No. CA-03-953-A
(E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.