Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-2040•Peter Hahn v. Williamsburg/james City County Public Schools
03-2040Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.04.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2040
PETER HAHN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAMSBURG/JAMES CITY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-02-156)
Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 5, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan H. Walker, MASON, MASON, WALKER & HEDRICK, P.C., Newport
News, Virginia, for Appellant. Nicolas R. Foster, John R. Porter,
III, CARR & PORTER, L.L.C., Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Peter Hahn appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his claims under the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. * We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Hahn v. Williamsburg/James City County Pub. Sch., No. CA-02-156
(E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.