Larry J. Hunter v. Jim Lee

03-1929Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.10.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1929
LARRY J. HUNTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIM LEE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-282-H-3)
Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 7, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry J. Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Lee Holland, Norwood
Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Larry J. Hunter appeals the district court’s order dismissing
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his complaint in which he
alleged employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Hunter v. Lee, No. CA-03-282-H-3 (E.D.N.C.
July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.