Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-1767•Charles Davis Burrell v. C. J. Jackson
03-1767Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.05.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1767
CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. J. JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 03-1768
CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. J. JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-03-198-3)
Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: May 14, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Davis Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Davis Burrell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and
entering a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Burrell v. Jackson, No.
CA-03-198-3 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 21, 2003 & entered Apr. 22, 2003;
May 9, 2003). We deny Burrell’s motion for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.