Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-1745•Evelyn Coulter v. United States of America
03-1745Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.03.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1745
EVELYN COULTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-1645)
Submitted: March 8, 2004 Decided: March 22, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan M. Mattson, HALE, HASSAN, CARLSON & PENN, PLC, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Anita Claire Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn Coulter appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act action for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coulter v.
United States, No. CA-02-1645 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.