American Monument Foundation, L.l.c v. Brett Livingstone Strong

03-1363Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.06.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1363
AMERICAN MONUMENT FOUNDATION, L.L.C.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRETT LIVINGSTONE STRONG,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
COMMERCIAL MOVING & RIGGING, INCORPORATED;
WILLIAMS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION; WILLIAMS
INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-897-A)
Submitted: December 17, 2003 Decided: June 16, 2004
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rachel L. Semanchik, Thomas O. Mason, WILLIAMS MULLEN, McLean,
Virginia, for Appellant. N. Thomas Connally, HOGAN & HARTSON
L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Brett Livingstone Strong appeals from the district
court’s order granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and
the magistrate judge’s order granting Plaintiff’s motion for
sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Am. Monument Found., LLC v. Strong, No. CA-02-897-A
(E.D. Va. filed Feb. 12, 2003; entered Feb. 19, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.