Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-1321•Elliott Roy Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, No. 02-1468, 2002 WL 1760769 4th Cir. July 31, 2002…
03-1321Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.06.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1321
ELLIOTT ROY BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY; SECRETARY OF
THE AIR FORCE; WILNET ASHLEY BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JACK B. STEVENS, Judge,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-1484-A)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elliott Roy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. James Christian Stuchell,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Elliot R. Brown appeals from the district court’s denial his
motions to reconsider the district court’s December 13, 2001 order
dismissing his state law claims for declaratory relief, accounting,
and restitution. We affirmed the district court’s December 13, 2001
order on appeal. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, No.
02-1468, 2002 WL 1760769 (4th Cir. July 31, 2002) (unpublished)
(per curiam). Because we have already affirmed the district court’s
disposition of his case, Brown’s further attacks on that order are
barred by principles of res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument, because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.