Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-7901•United States of America v. Willie L. Boston, Iii
02-7901Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.03.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7901
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIE L. BOSTON, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-99-98, CA-00-962)
Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie L. Boston, III, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie L. Boston, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s
May 31, 2002, order and judgment accepting the magistrate judge’s
May 2, 2001, report and recommendation and denying relief on
Boston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and the district court’s
October 21, 2002, order denying Boston’s motion for reconsideration
and non-publication. We have independently reviewed the record and
cannot conclude that reasonable jurists would find the district
court’s rulings debatable. Accordingly, we grant Boston’s pending
motion for non-publication of this Court’s opinion, deny a
certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (2000); Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL
431659, at *11 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.