Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-7319•Harkless A. Fossie v. A. B. Dickerson, Iii
02-7319Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.10.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7319
HARKLESS A. FOSSIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. B. DICKERSON, III; H. R. ORR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-756)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harkless A. Fossie, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harkless Fossie appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the
defendants’ uncontested motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge and the district court. See Fossie v. Dickerson,
No CA-00-756 (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2002; entered Aug. 20, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.