Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-7287•Edmund George Nowicki v. State of Maryland
02-7287Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.12.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7287
EDMUND GEORGE NOWICKI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-2116-PJM)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edmund George Nowicki, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edmund Nowicki, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2000), which it construed as a petition pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See
Nowicki v. State of Maryland, No. CA-02-2116-PM (D. Md. July 24,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.