Damon Emanuel Elliott v. John Vincent Geise

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7246
DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN VINCENT GEISE; RANGARATH MANTHRIPRAGADA;
PAMELA COCHRAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-1769-PJM)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Damon Emmanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for failure to allege specific facts
supporting his claims as instructed by the court’s prior order.
Because Elliott may be able to proceed with this action by amending
his complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, the
dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate
review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --