Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-7234•United States of America v. Dacey Maurice Jones
02-7234Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.10.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7234
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DACEY MAURICE JONES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-97-250, CA-00-615-1)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dacey Maurice Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dacey Maurice Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).
We have reviewed the record and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-
97-250; CA-00-615-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 26, 2000; entered July 29,
2002). We deny a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.