Gary S. Gutman v. Deborah Crawford

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7122
GARY S. GUTMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEBORAH CRAWFORD; JOHN KAY BANCROFT, Esquire,
in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-388-2)
Submitted: November 19, 2002 Decided: December 11, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary S. Gutman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gary S. Gutman appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §
1915A(b) (2000) and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
over his state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Gutman v. Crawford,
No. CA-02-388-2 (E.D. Va. July 1, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --