Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-7081•United States of America v. Donald Wardrick
02-7081Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.11.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7081
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DONALD WARDRICK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR-
95-294, CA-99-3381-PJM)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 6, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard L. Long, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. David Ira
Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Wardrick appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Wardrick, Nos. CR-95-294; CA-
99-3381-PJM (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.