Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6873•Ricky M. Watson v. ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail
02-6873Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.08.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6873
RICKY M. WATSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent, Hampton Roads
Regional Jail,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-01-107-2)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky M. Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ricky M. Watson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Watson v. Cherry, No. CA-01-107-2 (E.D.
Va. May 29, 2002). We deny his motions for summary judgment and to
obtain medical records. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.