Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6805•Jeffrey S. Blaney v. G. F. DRISCOLL, Law Librarian
02-6805Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.09.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6805
JEFFREY S. BLANEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. F. DRISCOLL, Law Librarian,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-98-1449-AM)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey S. Blaney, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffery S. Blaney appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm substantially on reasoning of the district court, see Blaney
v. Driscoll, No. CA-98-1449-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2002), noting
that because the motion to reconsider was filed more than ten days
after entry of the final judgment, the motion only is properly
considered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.