Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6686•William Franklin v. Bobby Shearin
02-6686Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.08.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6686
WILLIAM FRANKLIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
BOBBY SHEARIN; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director;
CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
02-70-JFM)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 7, 2002
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Franklin appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and on his motion to
alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district
court. See Franklin v. Shearin, No. CA-02-70-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 29
& Apr. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.