John D. Simpson v. Supreme Court Judge of Richmond State of Virginia

02-6653Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.08.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6653
JOHN D. SIMPSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SUPREME COURT JUDGE OF RICHMOND STATE OF
VIRGINIA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-538-3)
Submitted: July 3, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John D. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John D. Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying
his petition for a writ of mandamus and his motion filed under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simpson v. Supreme
Court Judge, No. CA-01-538-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2002; Apr. 18,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.