Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6616•United States of America v. Jamal Antwan Moon
02-6616Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.09.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6616
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMAL ANTWAN MOON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-99-203, CA-01-432)
Submitted: July 19, 2002 Decided: September 20, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Antwan Moon, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Antwan Moon seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for
enlargement of the record, deny the motion for leave to take
deposition, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Moon, Nos. CR-99-203; CA-01-432 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 15, 2002,
entered Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.