Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6578•United States of America v. George Bennett
02-6578Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.08.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6578
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE BENNETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-94-189)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Bennett appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No.
CR-94-189 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2002). We deny Bennett’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.