Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-6487•United States of America v. Orion Ross Harden
02-6487Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.07.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6487
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ORION ROSS HARDEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-97-70099, CA-01-991-7)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orion Ross Harden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Orion Ross Harden appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Harden, Nos. CR-97-70099; CA-01-991-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2002 & Feb.
26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.